Menzie, PhD, chair of the report committee and a principal at Exponent, an engineering and scientific consulting firm. ![]() The report recommends that the Environmental Protection Agency do an ecological risk assessment of UV filters and that the need for such an assessment is urgent. “Risk assessment is largely about the potential that chemicals may be harmful, and the closer that exposure levels get to effects levels, you get the increased likelihood that there could be an ecological risk,” says Charles A. “If one or more were to be removed from use for reasons of concerns about the environment, its impact would potentially disrupt the availability of broad-spectrum UV coverage, because most of the current products that are marketed use more than one of the UV filters,” Cullen says. The compounds are very different, he notes, and “things that can be learned about one do not necessarily carry over to another.” The benefits these UV filters provide in terms of sunburn and skin cancer protection have to be considered as well. Cullen, MD, vice chair of the committee that produced the report and former director of the Center for Population Health Sciences at Stanford University. ![]() A new report from the nonprofit, independent National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine outlines the challenges in determining the effect of the ultraviolet filters in sunscreen and other personal care products on freshwater environments and oceans and the plants, animals, and other organisms that live there. “There are many gaps in our understanding of the fate, distribution, and toxicity of the UV filters themselves, and especially when used together and in the face of other stressors on the environment, such as climate change,” says Mark S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |